From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barajas v. Stolc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Feb 24, 2012
No. CV11-0933-PHX-SRB (D. Ariz. Feb. 24, 2012)

Opinion

No. CV11-0933-PHX-SRB

02-24-2012

Oscar Barajas, Plaintiff, v. Bruno M. Stolc, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

On November 28, 2011the Magistrate Judge issued an Order directing Plaintiff to "file a motion for default judgment or show cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute." Plaintiff did not comply with the November 28, 2011 Order. On December 22, 2011, the Magistrate Judge issued his Report and Recommendation recommending that the Complaint and this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

In his Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge advised Plaintiff that he had 14 days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the Court. The time to file such objections has expired and no objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed.

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as the order of this Court. (doc. 25).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the this case is dismissed without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly.

_______________

Susan R. Bolton

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Barajas v. Stolc

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Feb 24, 2012
No. CV11-0933-PHX-SRB (D. Ariz. Feb. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Barajas v. Stolc

Case Details

Full title:Oscar Barajas, Plaintiff, v. Bruno M. Stolc, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Date published: Feb 24, 2012

Citations

No. CV11-0933-PHX-SRB (D. Ariz. Feb. 24, 2012)