Barajas v. Stockes

Full title: SAMUAL BARAJAS, Petitioner, v. J.D. STOCKES, WARDEN, Respondent

Court: United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 8, 2007

1:05-cv-01646-LJO-DLB-HC (E.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2007)

Opinion

1:05-cv-01646-LJO-DLB-HC.

August 8, 2007

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 21) ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ENTER JUDGMENT FOR RESPONDENT

LAWRENCE O'NEILL, Magistrate Judge

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

On May 22, 2007, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be DENIED, and the Clerk of Court be directed to enter judgment in favor of Respondent. These Findings and Recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. On June 8, 2007, Petitioner filed objections to the Findings and Recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Petitioner's objections, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and proper analysis. Petitioner's objections present no grounds for questioning the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Findings and Recommendations, filed May 22, 2007, are ADOPTED IN FULL;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,

3. The Clerk of Court enter judgment in favor of Respondent and close this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.