From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Barajas v. Frauenhiem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 18, 2017
Case No. CV 16-7607 JVS (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-7607 JVS (SS)

03-18-2017

FRANCISCO BARAJAS, Petitioner, v. S. FRAUENHIEM, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. \\ \\ \\ \\ \\

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Petitioner at his address of record.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: 3.18.17

/s/_________

JAMES V. SELNA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Barajas v. Frauenhiem

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 18, 2017
Case No. CV 16-7607 JVS (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2017)
Case details for

Barajas v. Frauenhiem

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO BARAJAS, Petitioner, v. S. FRAUENHIEM, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 18, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 16-7607 JVS (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2017)