From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baptiste v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 27, 2003
302 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)

Opinion

91800

Decided and Entered: February 27, 2003.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Franklin County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Hugh Baptiste, Malone, petitioner pro se.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Carpinello and, Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules prohibiting violent conduct, committing an unhygienic act, interfering with a facility employee and wasting state property after it was alleged that he had violently pushed a hot food tray back through his cell's feedup hatch and onto the floor causing food to splatter the correction officer who had delivered the tray. Substantial evidence of petitioner's guilt was presented at the disciplinary hearing in the form of the detailed misbehavior report and the testimony of the reporting correction officer who, having witnessed the events in question, was able to positively identify petitioner as the inmate who had shoved the tray back through the hatch (see Matter of Ragland v. Great Meadow Correctional Facility, 243 A.D.2d 977). Petitioner's testimony and that of his cellmate, in which they attested to petitioner's innocence of the charged misconduct, presented issues of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Melette v. Lacy, 251 A.D.2d 831). Petitioner's assertion of hearing officer bias has been examined and found to be unsupported by the record (see Matter of McCorkle v. Selsky, 264 A.D.2d 890, 891). Moreover, petitioner has not demonstrated that the outcome of the hearing flowed from the alleged bias (see id.). The remaining contentions raised herein have been examined and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Peters, Carpinello and Lahtinen, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


Summaries of

Baptiste v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 27, 2003
302 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
Case details for

Baptiste v. Goord

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of HUGH BAPTISTE, Petitioner, v. GLENN GOORD, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 27, 2003

Citations

302 A.D.2d 820 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)
754 N.Y.S.2d 598

Citing Cases

In the Matter of Martinez v. Goord

Also, the occupant of the affected cell testified that he, rather than petitioner, had thrown the feces from…

In the Matter of Johnson v. Goord

Our review of the hearing transcript belies his assertion that the Hearing Officer assisted witnesses in…