From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bannon v. Garrett

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 15, 2023
3:22-cv-00370-ART-CSD (D. Nev. Feb. 15, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00370-ART-CSD

02-15-2023

JARED BANNON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN GARRETT, et al., Respondents.


ORDER

ANNE R.TRAUM UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In this habeas corpus action, after a 90-day initial period, Petitioner Jared Bannon, who is represented by appointed counsel, was due on February 2, 2023, to file an amended habeas petition. (See ECF No. 10.) On February 2, 2023, Bannon filed a motion for extension of time (ECF No. 14) requesting a 90-day extension of that deadline, to May 3, 2023. Bannon's counsel states that the extension of time is necessary because of the time required to obtain the state court record and investigate the case. Bannon's counsel represents that Respondents do not oppose the motion for extension of time. The Court finds that the motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, and that there is good cause for the requested extension of time.

It is therefore ordered that Petitioner's Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 14) is granted. Petitioner will have until and including May 3, 2023, to file his amended petition for writ of habeas corpus. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings set forth in the order entered August 16, 2023 (ECF No. 10) will remain in effect.


Summaries of

Bannon v. Garrett

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Feb 15, 2023
3:22-cv-00370-ART-CSD (D. Nev. Feb. 15, 2023)
Case details for

Bannon v. Garrett

Case Details

Full title:JARED BANNON, Petitioner, v. WARDEN GARRETT, et al., Respondents.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Feb 15, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-00370-ART-CSD (D. Nev. Feb. 15, 2023)