From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banning v. King County

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Feb 7, 2000
99 Wn. App. 1027 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000)

Summary

defining appurtenant “as an incidental property right or privilege belonging to a principal right and passing in possession with it, and as a subordinate part, adjunct or accessory” and as something which “stands in relation of and incident to a principal and is necessarily connected with the use and enjoyment of the latter”

Summary of this case from 1500 Range Way Partners, LLC v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Ass'n

Opinion

Nos. 43085-8-I; 43462-4-I.

February 7, 2000. UNREPORTED OPINION

Appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County No. 97-2-11623-6, Steven G. Scott, J., entered June 26 and September 22, 1998.


Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Kennedy C.J., concurred in by Grosse and Agid, JJ.


Summaries of

Banning v. King County

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
Feb 7, 2000
99 Wn. App. 1027 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000)

defining appurtenant “as an incidental property right or privilege belonging to a principal right and passing in possession with it, and as a subordinate part, adjunct or accessory” and as something which “stands in relation of and incident to a principal and is necessarily connected with the use and enjoyment of the latter”

Summary of this case from 1500 Range Way Partners, LLC v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Ass'n
Case details for

Banning v. King County

Case Details

Full title:BRUCE L. BANNING, ET AL., Appellants, v. KING COUNTY, ET AL., Respondents

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One

Date published: Feb 7, 2000

Citations

99 Wn. App. 1027 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000)
99 Wash. App. 1027

Citing Cases

1500 Range Way Partners, LLC v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, National Ass'n

The Supreme Court of Washington recently cited with approval several definitions broadly defining appurtenant…