ion. See, e.g., Washington v. Piper, No. 18-CV-7783, 2019 WL 6343516, at *5 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 26, 2019) (holding that “a poke to the groin while he was in inside of his housing unit fail” does not meet the objective standard of a constitutional violation); Holloway v. Dep't of Corr., No. 11-CV-1290, 2013 WL 4834657, at *8 (D. Conn. Sept. 10, 2013) (dismissing a claim because the “brief instance of alleged sexual touching was not severe enough to constitute a serious deprivation of the plaintiff's life's necessities”); Harry v. Suarez, No. 10-CV-6756, 2012 WL 2053533, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. June 4, 2012) (granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of a defendant prison official where the plaintiff alleged that the official “groped [the inmate's] genitals, buttocks, and inner thighs for up to fifty three seconds in the course of a frisk” because it failed to state an Eighth Amendment claim); Banks v. William, No. 11-CV-8667, 2012 WL 4761502, at * 4 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 27, 2012) (“In this case, [the plaintiff] alleges that [the defendant] fondled him on a single occasion during a pat-down frisk