From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 22, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2022 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-2022 FCD KJM P.

October 22, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has paid the filing fee.

Since petitioner may be entitled to requested relief if the claimed violation of constitutional rights is proved, respondents will be directed to file a response to petitioner's petition.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent is directed to file a response to petitioner's application within sixty days from the date of this order. See Rule 4, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. An answer shall be accompanied by any and all transcripts or other documents relevant to the determination of the issues presented in the application. See Rule 5, Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases;

2. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days of service of an answer;

3. If the response to petitioner's application is a motion, petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed and served within thirty days of service of the motion, and respondent's reply, if any, shall be filed within fifteen days thereafter; and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order together with a copy of petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General.


Summaries of

Banks v. Walker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 22, 2008
No. CIV S-07-2022 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Banks v. Walker

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM BANKS, Petitioner, v. JAMES WALKER, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 22, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-2022 FCD KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 22, 2008)