From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. U.S. Penitentiary

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 24, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00378-BNB-PAC (D. Colo. Oct. 24, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00378-BNB-PAC.

October 24, 2006


ORDER


This matter is before me on the plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint [Doc. # 52, filed 9/22/2006] (the " Motion"). I held a hearing on the Motion this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record:

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to accept for filing the Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint [Doc. # 53, filed 9/22/2006].

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions to dismiss are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and may be renewed, if appropriate, in response to the Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendants shall respond to the Second Amended Complaint on or before November 11, 2006.


Summaries of

Banks v. U.S. Penitentiary

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Oct 24, 2006
Civil Action No. 06-cv-00378-BNB-PAC (D. Colo. Oct. 24, 2006)
Case details for

Banks v. U.S. Penitentiary

Case Details

Full title:ROSE M. BANKS, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY, FLORENCE…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Oct 24, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-cv-00378-BNB-PAC (D. Colo. Oct. 24, 2006)