From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. The Pac. Crest Trail Ass'n

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 23, 2024
SACV 23-1026-MWF (SSC) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2024)

Opinion

SACV 23-1026-MWF (SSC)

08-23-2024

JIM L. BANKS, Plaintiff v. THE PACIFIC CREST TRAIL ASSOCIATION, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On July 16, 2024, the Court granted Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, dismissed with prejudice Plaintiff's existing due process claim based on the handling of his administrative complaint, dismissed with prejudice Defendant Holzworth from the action, and dismissed Plaintiff's equal protection claim with leave to amend. (Docket No. 43). The Court allowed Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint (“SAC”) no later than July 30, 2024. (Id.).

To date, Plaintiff has not filed a SAC or otherwise responded to the Court's Order. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30 (1962).

This Order shall constitute notice of entry of judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Pursuant to Local Rule 58-6, the Court ORDERS the Clerk to treat this Order, and its entry on the docket, as an entry of judgment.


Summaries of

Banks v. The Pac. Crest Trail Ass'n

United States District Court, Central District of California
Aug 23, 2024
SACV 23-1026-MWF (SSC) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2024)
Case details for

Banks v. The Pac. Crest Trail Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:JIM L. BANKS, Plaintiff v. THE PACIFIC CREST TRAIL ASSOCIATION, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Aug 23, 2024

Citations

SACV 23-1026-MWF (SSC) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2024)