From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Stovall

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 31, 2009
No. 3:08-CV-1621-O ECF (N.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2009)

Opinion

No. 3:08-CV-1621-O ECF.

March 31, 2009


ORDER


Under authority of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this pro se action was referred to U.S. Magistrate Judge Paul D. Stickney for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. On February 20, 2009, the Magistrate Judge issued his Findings and Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed with prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b). Doc. No. 7. On March 9, 2009, Plaintiff filed his objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations. Doc. No. 8.

After conducting a review de novo of the pleadings, files and records in this case, the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and the objections thereto, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court is of the opinion that they are correct and are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Banks v. Stovall

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
Mar 31, 2009
No. 3:08-CV-1621-O ECF (N.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2009)
Case details for

Banks v. Stovall

Case Details

Full title:TITUS BANKS, 1470843, Plaintiff, v. SINDHU ALEXANDER STOVALL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: Mar 31, 2009

Citations

No. 3:08-CV-1621-O ECF (N.D. Tex. Mar. 31, 2009)