From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 22, 2001
793 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 4D00-3272

Opinion filed August 22, 2001

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Richard I. Wennet, Judge; L.T. Case No. 90-16725CFA02.

Michael B. Banks, Polk City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


Affirmed, without prejudice for appellant to seek relief from the Department of Corrections, and if necessary, filing a petition for writ of mandamus in the circuit court in the county in which he is incarcerated. See Killings v. State, 567 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (holding that any complaint appellant may have about the Department of Corrections' interpretation of his sentences must be addressed through administrative proceedings and, if necessary, by mandamus in the circuit court); see also, Bedford v. State, 775 So.2d 402 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (holding that a mandamus petition, rather than motion for post conviction relief, was appropriate remedy to have Department of Corrections honor amount of jail credit awarded in each of defendant's sentences).

FARMER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Banks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 22, 2001
793 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Banks v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL B. BANKS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 22, 2001

Citations

793 So. 2d 132 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Patterson v. State

The trial court's order denying the appellant's motion to enforce plea agreement is affirmed without…

Patterson v. State

Affirmed without prejudice to appellant seeking relief in accordance with Bedford v. State, 775 So.2d 402…