From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. S MA'AT

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Aug 3, 2021
2:20-CV-01610 (W.D. La. Aug. 3, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-CV-01610 SEC P

08-03-2021

FREDERICK BANKS #05711-068 v. S MA'AT ET AL


KAY, MAGISTRATE JUDGE

JUDGMENT

JAMES D. CAIN, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10) by the Magistrate Judge recommending that the instant lawsuit be dismissed because of failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Instead of filing an opposition, Plaintiff Frederick Banks filed a "Motion to Reopen Case" (Doc. 12) accompanied with an email string in an attempt to prove that he had exhausted his administrative remedies. Considering the motion and the newly discovered evidence, but without determining if Mr. Banks has in fact exhausted his administrative remedies, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Report and Recommendation is DENIED, and the Motion to Reopen the Case is GRANTED.


Summaries of

Banks v. S MA'AT

United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana
Aug 3, 2021
2:20-CV-01610 (W.D. La. Aug. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Banks v. S MA'AT

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK BANKS #05711-068 v. S MA'AT ET AL

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Louisiana

Date published: Aug 3, 2021

Citations

2:20-CV-01610 (W.D. La. Aug. 3, 2021)