From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Pugh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 11, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-119 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 13-119

03-11-2013

FREDERICK BANKS, Plaintiffs v. WARDEN W. PUGH, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER

Before the Court is a document, entitled "Notice of Appeal; And Motion for Reconsideration" [document #7], wherein plaintiff seeks relief from the memorandum order entered by Magistrate Judge Robert C. Mitchell on January 25, 2013 [document #6], which was subsequently clarified by the Magistrate Judge on March 5, 2013 [document #8]. Upon review of the issues raised by the appeal, the Court concludes that the original order of January 25, 2013, and later clarified on March 5, 2013, is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72.

Therefore, this 11 day of March, 2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiff's appeal, and any request for reconsideration, is DENIED and the order of January 25, 2013, as clarified on March 5, 2013, is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

_______________, C.J. cc: The Honorable Robert C. Mitchell,

United States Magistrate Judge

Frederick Banks, #05711-068

Northeast Ohio Correction Center

2240 Hubbard Road

Youngstown, OH 44505


Summaries of

Banks v. Pugh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Mar 11, 2013
Civil Action No. 13-119 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Banks v. Pugh

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK BANKS, Plaintiffs v. WARDEN W. PUGH, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Mar 11, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 13-119 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 11, 2013)