From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Pugh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Aug 7, 2013
CASE NO. 4:13 CV 335 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 7, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 4:13 CV 335

08-07-2013

FREDERICK BANKS, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL PUGH, et al., Respondents.


JUDGE DAN AARON POLSTER


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

AND ORDER

On February 14, 2013, petitioner pro se Frederick Banks, a federal prisoner at the Northeast Ohio Correctional Center ("NEOCC"), filed the above-captioned in forma pauperis habeas corpus action under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. As grounds for the petition, he asserts that because he is Native American his incarceration violates the Northwest Ordinance and 8 U.S.C. § 1401(b). Further, he complains that he has been subjected adverse conditions of confinement in NEOCC'S Special Housing Unit.

As a threshold matter, there is no colorable basis for petitioner's claim that, as a Native American, he may not be confined in a federal prison. Moreover, to the extent he seeks to challenge the conditions of his confinement, habeas corpus is not the appropriate vehicle to do so. Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 498-99 (1973); Luedtke v. Berkebile, 704. F.3d 465 (6th Cir. 2013). To seek relief concerning those conditions, he would need to file a civil rights action.

To file a civil rights action, petitioner would have to file a complaint in a new case and either pay the $350 filing fee or file a prisoner account statement with sufficient sufficient financial information for the court to assess and collect the filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).

Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted, and this action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243. The court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DAN AARON POLSTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Banks v. Pugh

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Aug 7, 2013
CASE NO. 4:13 CV 335 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Banks v. Pugh

Case Details

Full title:FREDERICK BANKS, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL PUGH, et al., Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

Date published: Aug 7, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 4:13 CV 335 (N.D. Ohio Aug. 7, 2013)

Citing Cases

Cook v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons

Cases filed by Banks which were dismissed as frivolous, malicious or failed to state a claim under 28 U.S.C.…

Banks v. Valaluka

Cases filed by Banks which were dismissed as frivolous, malicious or failed to state a claim under 28 U.S.C.…