From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Nissan North America, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 29, 2011
CASE NO. C 11-2022 PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. C 11-2022 PJH

11-29-2011

BRANDON BANKS and ERIN BANKS, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated consumers, Plaintiffs, v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.; NISSAN MOTOR CO., LTD.; NISSAN DESIGN AMERICA, INC., Defendants.

Respectfully submitted, GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP G. Charles Nierlich G. CHARLES NIERLICH, SBN 196611 RACHEL A. FLIPSE, SBN 273659 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP TIMOTHY W. LOOSE, SBN 241037 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP Attorneys for Defendant Nissan North America, Inc. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS F. Jerome Tapley (pro hac vice) Clayeo C. Arnold, SBN 65070 Kirk J. Wolden, SBN 138902 Clifford L. Carter, SBN 149621 CLAYEO C. ARNOLD A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION F. Jerome Tapley (pro hac vice) Hirlye R. "Ryan" Lutz, III (pro hac vice) CORY WATSON CROWDER & DEGARIS, PC. Attorneys for Plaintiffs Brandon and Erin Banks


G. CHARLES NIERLICH, SBN 196611

RACHEL A. FLIPSE, SBN 273659

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

Attorneys for Defendant,

NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC.

Clayeo C. Arnold, SBN 65070

Kirk J. Wolden, SBN 138902 Clifford L. Carter, SBN 149621

CLAYEO C. ARNOLD

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Class

[Additional counsel on signature page]

JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL

OF NDA

Trial Date:

None set

The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, jointly submit this stipulation of dismissal as to NISSAN DESIGN AMERICA, INC. (hereinafter "NDA"), only:

WHEREAS, NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC. (hereinafter "NNA"), stipulates that NDA is operated as a division of NNA and NDA no longer exists as a separate legal entity;

WHEREAS, NNA stipulates that NDA used to be a Delaware corporation whose principal place of business was in California during the time that the 2004-2006 Nissan Armada and Titan Trucks, and Infiniti QX56 vehicles ("AFFECTED VEHICLES") were designed, developed and marketed;

WHEREAS, NNA stipulates that NDA's liability, if any, arising from the allegations contained in the lawsuit, is the liability of the now parent corporation NNA;

Based upon these stipulations of NNA , the parties jointly stipulate to the dismissal of NDA.

Respectfully submitted,

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

G. Charles Nierlich

G. CHARLES NIERLICH, SBN 196611

RACHEL A. FLIPSE, SBN 273659

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

TIMOTHY W. LOOSE, SBN 241037

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

Attorneys for Defendant

Nissan North America, Inc.

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS

F. Jerome Tapley (pro hac vice)

Clayeo C. Arnold, SBN 65070

Kirk J. Wolden, SBN 138902

Clifford L. Carter, SBN 149621

CLAYEO C. ARNOLD

A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

F. Jerome Tapley (pro hac vice)

Hirlye R. "Ryan" Lutz, III (pro hac vice)

CORY WATSON CROWDER & DEGARIS, PC.

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

Brandon and Erin Banks

Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton


Summaries of

Banks v. Nissan North America, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION
Nov 29, 2011
CASE NO. C 11-2022 PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Banks v. Nissan North America, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BRANDON BANKS and ERIN BANKS, individually and on behalf of a class of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. C 11-2022 PJH (N.D. Cal. Nov. 29, 2011)