From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Lombardo

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 5, 2022
2:20-cv-00556-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Apr. 5, 2022)

Opinion

2:20-cv-00556-APG-NJK

04-05-2022

JAMES VINCENT BANKS, Plaintiffs, v. JOSEPH LOMBARDO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

[DOCKET NO. 54]

Nancy J. Koppe United States Magistrate Judge

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion for courtesy copies. Docket No. 54.

An inmate has no constitutional right to free photocopying. Johnson v. Moore, 948 F.2d 517, 521 (9th Cir. 1991). The Court cannot provide free copies even to indigent plaintiffs proceeding in forma pauperis, because the in forma pauperis statute does not authorize the Court to pay the costs for an indigent litigant's copy requests. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. If Plaintiff seeks copies of documents, he must submit a “Copy and Service Request” form to the Clerk of the Court and pay the appropriate fees.

Copies produced from an electronic format (CM/ECF) are $0.10 per page; copies produced from a physical format are $0.50 per page.

In this case, Plaintiff seeks from the Court free copies of the docket sheet, a few orders, a motion filed by Defendant Bryant, and several of Plaintiff's own filings. See Docket No. 54 at 4-8. Plaintiff has not shown that he is entitled to free copies of any of these documents. Plaintiff has not adequately explained why he needs a copy of the docket and, judging from his instant motion, he does not appear to be uninformed as to the filings in the case. The orders identified were already mailed to Plaintiff when they were entered. See Docket Nos. 30, 35 (notices of electronic filing showing service by mail). If Plaintiff did not receive copies of the orders already, 1 that is an issue for him to address with the facility at which he is an inmate. Similarly, to the extent Plaintiff contends he did not receive a motion filed by Defendant Bryan, that is an issue for him to address with Defendant Bryan's counsel. With respect to the request for free copies of Plaintiff s own filings, it is ultimately the responsibility of a filer (including a prisoner) to ensure that he is creating copies of his filings. The Court cannot act as a free photocopier for every inmate and, instead, prisoners must take steps to copy their own filings. As noted above, to the extent a prisoner seeks copies from the Court, he must submit the appropriate form and pay the applicable fees.

Among other concerns with Plaintiff's request, judicial resources should not be tapped in this manner as it would enable litigants to circumvent the procedures and costs to make their own copies of their filings.

Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion for courtesy copies is DENIED. The Court INSTRUCTS the Clerk's Office to mail Plaintiff the “Copy and Service Request” form.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 2


Summaries of

Banks v. Lombardo

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 5, 2022
2:20-cv-00556-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Apr. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Banks v. Lombardo

Case Details

Full title:JAMES VINCENT BANKS, Plaintiffs, v. JOSEPH LOMBARDO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 5, 2022

Citations

2:20-cv-00556-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Apr. 5, 2022)