From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Food & Drug Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 31, 2012
Civil Action No. 12 0161 (D.D.C. Jan. 31, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12 0161

01-31-2012

RAYNOLDO BANKS, Plaintiff, v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The plaintiff identifies the defendant as "FEDERAL DRUGE AMINSTRIONS," which presumably is a reference to the Food and Drug Administration. The court notes that plaintiff filed an identical complaint against this same defendant, and the complaint was dismissed without prejudice for its failure to comply with the basic notice pleading requirements of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Banks v. Food & Drug Admin., No. 12-0065 (D.D.C. Jan. 17, 2012). The instant complaint is a repetitive lawsuit, and the court will dismiss it under 29 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) as frivolous and malicious.

An Order consistent with this Memorandum Opinion is issued separately.

_________________________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Banks v. Food & Drug Admin.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Jan 31, 2012
Civil Action No. 12 0161 (D.D.C. Jan. 31, 2012)
Case details for

Banks v. Food & Drug Admin.

Case Details

Full title:RAYNOLDO BANKS, Plaintiff, v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Date published: Jan 31, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12 0161 (D.D.C. Jan. 31, 2012)