From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Court of Common Pleas of Phila. Cnty.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Mar 23, 2016
133 A.3d 736 (Pa. 2016)

Opinion

No. 16 EM 2016.

03-23-2016

Brahim BANKS, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, Respondent.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of March, 2016, the Application for Leave to File Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See Commonwealth v. Ali, 608 Pa. 71, 10 A.3d 282 (2010) (explaining that hybrid representation is not permitted). The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward the filings to counsel of record.


Summaries of

Banks v. Court of Common Pleas of Phila. Cnty.

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
Mar 23, 2016
133 A.3d 736 (Pa. 2016)
Case details for

Banks v. Court of Common Pleas of Phila. Cnty.

Case Details

Full title:BRAHIM BANKS, Petitioner v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

Date published: Mar 23, 2016

Citations

133 A.3d 736 (Pa. 2016)