From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Arpaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 13, 2006
No. CV 06-1330-PHX-DGC (VAM) (D. Ariz. Jun. 13, 2006)

Opinion

No. CV 06-1330-PHX-DGC (VAM).

June 13, 2006


ORDER


This is a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 filed by an inmate confined in the Lower Buckeye Jail in Phoenix, Arizona. The Court will dismiss the complaint with leave to amend.

A. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Filing Fee.

Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. No initial partial filing fee is assessed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). The fee will be collected monthly in payments of 20 percent of the previous month's income, each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate Order requiring the appropriate government agency to collect the fees according to the statutory formula.

B. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints.

The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if Plaintiff has raised claims that are legally "frivolous or malicious," that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts, a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend the complaint before dismissal of the action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) ( en banc). The Court is required to grant leave to amend "if a complaint can possibly be saved," but not if the Complaint "lacks merit entirely." Id. at 1129. A court therefore should grant leave to amend if the pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts, or if it appears at all possible that the defect can be corrected. Id. at 1130.

The Court should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of advice "would undermine the district judges' role as impartial decisionmakers." Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n. 13 (declining to decide whether court was required to inform litigant of deficiencies). Plaintiff's Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend because the complaint may possibly be saved by amendment.

C. Complaint.

Plaintiff sues Sheriff Joseph Arpaio and five unnamed officers from the Fourth Avenue Jail in Phoenix, Arizona. In Count I Plaintiff alleges that he is denied meaningful access to legal research materials. He claims that officers are retaliating against him when they fail to provide the proper forms and claim they cannot access certain legal materials for Plaintiff. Plaintiff states that one of his civil actions may be dismissed due to the actions of the officers.

In Count II Plaintiff contends that on April 10, 2006 he went to court without being fed. He asserts that he is a diabetic, and he ended up going without food for 23 hours. He further alleges that he filed a grievance which he was not allowed to forward, and he has not received any response since the shift supervisor spoke to him. Plaintiff claims that his grievance was thrown away. He also states that he went 18 hours without food on May 11, 2006. Finally, he alleges that his religious material and religious certificate were missing after his pod was searched on May 11, 2006. He contends that his religious material was previously thrown away.

In Count III Plaintiff alleges that he is exposed to inmates talking all through the night, cells are overcrowded, he has had to sleep on the concrete floor, and his grievances have not been properly responded to. As a result, Plaintiff claims he suffers interference with his daily human activities, sickness from close confinement with other inmates, and threats to his safety. He argues that these allegations constitute violations of the Hart v. Hill judgment. For relief, Plaintiff seeks monetary damages and sanctions.

D. Failure to State a Claim. 1. Defendants

To state a § 1983 claim, a plaintiff must allege that he suffered specific injury as a result of the specific conduct of a defendant, and show an affirmative link between the injury and that conduct. Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976). Plaintiff has not connected any of his claims to the Defendants. A defendant is liable only if he "play[ed] an affirmative part in the alleged deprivation of constitutional rights." King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 568 (9th Cir. 1987). This means that Plaintiff "must allege facts, not simply conclusions, that show that an individual was personally involved in the deprivation of his civil rights." Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998). In setting forth his claims, Plaintiff has not identified which officers allegedly denied him access to legal materials, failed to feed him, threw away his grievances, or removed his religious materials. Plaintiff has identified each John Doe Defendant by badge number in the list of defendants, however, he fails to connect these Defendants by badge number to the conduct alleged within each count. This deficiency may be curable by amendment.

If the evidence justifies it, Plaintiff may name persons in their individual capacities. If he does so, he must write short, plain statements telling the court: (1) the constitutional right Plaintiff believes was violated; (2) the name of the person who violated the right; (3) exactly what that individual did or failed to do; (4) how the action or inaction of that person is connected to the violation of Plaintiff's constitutional right; and (5) what specific injury Plaintiff suffered because of that person's conduct. Rizzo, 423 U.S. at 371-72, 377. Plaintiff must repeat this process for each person he names as a Defendant. If Plaintiff fails to do this for any person named as a Defendant, the court will dismiss that Defendant from this action.

Plaintiff sues Defendant Arpaio in his official capacity. When a person is sued in an official capacity, the real party in interest is the entity of which the officer is an agent.Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159, 165-66 (1985) (quotingMonell v. New York City Dep't of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 690 n. 55 (1978)). In their official capacities, "[c]ounty officials can be held liable under § 1983 if they act as "lawmakers or . . . those whose edicts or acts may fairly be said to represent official policy." Berry v. Baca, 379 F.3d 764, 767 (9th Cir. 2004) (quoting Monell, 436 U.S. at 694). Plaintiff must also show that an official municipal policy caused him to suffer a constitutional tort. Berry, 379 F.3d at 767. The entity may also be liable when its custom played a part in the violation of federal law. Kentucky, 473 U.S. at 166. In this action, Plaintiff has not alleged that an official policy or custom by Defendant Arpaio caused him to suffer harm.

In light of the foregoing, there are no named Defendants who may be liable for Plaintiff's claims. For this reason, Plaintiff's action fails to state a claim.

2. Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

Rule 8(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., requires that a complaint contain "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." Rule 8(e)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that "[e]ach averment of a pleading shall be simple, concise, and direct." Plaintiff's lengthy supporting facts — particularly in Count II — which include numerous claims, violate this rule. Plaintiff should consider the following example of a short plain statement of a claim in a standard negligence complaint:

1. Allegation of jurisdiction.
2. On June 1, 1936, in a public highway called Boylston Street in Boston, Massachusetts, defendant negligently drove a motor vehicle against plaintiff, who was then crossing said highway.
3. As a result plaintiff was thrown down and had his leg broken, and was otherwise injured, was prevented from transacting his business, suffered great pain of body and mind, and incurred expenses for medical attention and hospitalization in the sum of one thousand dollars.
McHenry v. Renne, 84 F.3d 1172, 1177 (9th Cir. 1996) (quoting Fed.R.Civ.P. 84, Form 9). These allegations "fully set forth who is being sued, for what relief, and on what theory, with enough detail to guide discovery." Id. This type of Complaint "can be read in seconds and answered in minutes." Id. Plaintiff is advised to apply these standards when submitting an Amended Complaint or his action may be dismissed.

In Plaintiff's case, this would be 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This jurisdictional allegation should be alleged on the first page of court-approved complaint form, in the space provided.

3. Hart v. Hill

Throughout his Complaint, Plaintiff appears to refer to paragraphs from the Amended Judgment in Hart v. Hill, No. CIV 77-0479-PHX-EHC (MS) (D. Ariz.). Jurisdiction to enforce the judgment is retained by the court which entered it. Jeff D. v. Kempthorne, 365 F.3d 844, 853 (9th Cir. 2004). A civil rights action is not the proper means by which to enforce the decree.Cagle v. Sutherland, 334 F.3d 980, 986 (11th Cir. 2003); Klein v. Zavaras, 80 F.3d 432, 435 (10th Cir. 1996); DeGidio v. Pung, 920 F.2d 525, 534 (8th Cir. 1990); Green v. McKaskle, 788 F.2d 1116, 1122-23 (5th Cir. 1986). Standing alone, remedial orders cannot serve as a substantive basis for a § 1983 claim for damages because such orders do not create "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws." Green, 788 F.3d at 1123-24. Remedial decrees are the means by which unconstitutional conditions are corrected but they do not create or enlarge constitutional rights. Id. at 1123. To the extent Plaintiff seeks to enforce Hart v. Hill, his claim is not properly brought in this action. Instead, his allegations must separately state a violation of a constitutional right.

E. Leave to Amend.

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within thirty days, Plaintiff may submit a First Amended Complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for his First Amended Complaint.

Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is a First Amended Complaint. The First Amended Complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count.

The First Amended Complaint supersedes the original Complaint.Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the original Complaint will be treated as nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original Complaint but not the First Amended Complaint is waived. King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987).

F. Warnings. 1. Release

Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release. Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay the balance, or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result in dismissal.

2. Address Changes

Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address 10 days before the move is effective, if practicable. See LRCIV 83.3(d). Plaintiff shall not include a motion for other relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal.

3. Copies

Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every document that he files for use by the Court. See LRCIV 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice to Plaintiff.

4. Possible "strike"

Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the dismissal will count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 5. Possible dismissal

Plaintiff is warned that failure to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these warnings, may result in dismissal of this action without further notice. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court may dismiss action for failure to comply with any order of the Court).

IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

(2) As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed no initial partial filing fee.

(3) The Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. Within thirty days from the date this Order is filed, Plaintiff must submit a First Amended Complaint.

(4) If Plaintiff fails to comply, the Clerk of Court shall enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice and not that the dismissal falls under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

(5) The Clerk of Court shall mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil rights complaint by a prisoner.

INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR A PRISONER FILING CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA I. General Information About the Civil Rights Complaint Form: A. The Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help prisoners prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. Local Rule of Civil Procedure 3.4(a) requires that prisoner civil rights complaints be filed on the court-approved form. Your complaint must be typewritten or legibly handwritten. All information must be clearly and concisely written, only in the space provided on the form. If needed, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages of standard letter size paper to continue any part of the complaint. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages.

B. Your Signature. You must sign the complaint. Your signature constitutes a certificate that: 1) you have read the complaint; 2) to the best of your knowledge, information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry it is well grounded in fact and law; and 3) it is not being filed for any improper purpose. Please review Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 11 provides for the imposition of sanctions if the complaint is signed in violation of the Rule.

C. The Filing Fee. You must pay the $350.00 filing fee. If you are unable to pay the filing fee when the complaint is filed, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the "Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915" for more information.

D. Court Divisions. If you resided in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila county when your rights were allegedly violated, you should file your complaint in the Phoenix Division of the court. If you resided in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai county when your rights were allegedly violated, you should file your complaint in the Prescott Division of the court. If you resided in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee county when your rights were allegedly violated, you should file your complaint in the Tucson Division of the court. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a).

You should mail THE ORIGINAL AND ONE COPY of your complaint with the $350.00 filing fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to:Phoenix Prescott Divisions: OR Tucson Division

: U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 321 U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500 401 West Washington Street, SPC 10 405 West Congress Street Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119 Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010

E. Certificate of Service on Defendants. You must furnish the opposing party or their attorney with a copy of any document you submit to the court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Pursuant to Rules 5(a) and (d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, each original document (except the initial complaint and application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the document was mailed to the opposing party or their attorney and the address to which it was mailed. Any document received by the court which does not include a certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form:

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed this ____ day of (month), (year), to: Name:____________________________ Address: ________________________ Attorney for Defendant(s)/Respondent(s)

_____________________ (Signature)

F. Original and Judge's Copy. You must furnish an original and one copy of any document submitted to the court. You must furnish one additional copy to the clerk if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to the original.

G. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint. Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased in the complaint. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or oppose a motion for summary judgment or at trial.

H. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the clerk and the opposing party or their attorney in writing of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the court of any change in your mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case.

I. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the court-approved civil rights complaint form. Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows you to file one amended complaint prior to any defendant filing an answer. After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge a proposed amended complaint. Local Rule of Civil Procedure 15.1(a)(2) prohibits any amended pleading from referencing any prior pleading. Further, any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed.

J. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any of the District Judges, Magistrates Judges, or the staff of any of the judicial officers. The appropriate way to communicate with these persons is by filing a written pleading or motion.

II. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form:

HEADING:
1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or jail inmate number, and mailing address on the lines provided.
2. Defendants. Print the names of each of your defendants. If you name more than four defendants, you should print the name of one defendant and "see additional page for defendants" in the space provided. On the additional page you must list the names of all of the defendants. This additional page should be inserted after page 1 and numbered as page "1-A" at the bottom of the page. The initial complaint must contain the names of all of the parties (plaintiffs as well as defendants) in the heading (or on the additional page if more than four defendants). See Rule 10(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write "JURY TRIAL DEMANDED" on the line below "CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER." Failure to do so will result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking only injunctive relief.

Part A. JURISDICTION:

1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; "Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents" for federal defendants; or "other." If you mark "other," identify the source of that authority.
2. Plaintiff. Print all of the requested information on the spaces provided. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights occurred.
3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the necessary information about each additional defendant on a separate page. Label the page(s) as "2-A," "2-B," etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.

Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS:

You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as "2-A," "2-B," etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2.

Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION:

You must identify what rights the defendant(s) violated. The form provides space to allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number the additional pages "5-A", "5-B", etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages.

1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. YOU MAY ALLEGE THE VIOLATION OF ONLY ONE CIVIL RIGHTS CLAIM PER COUNT.
2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your claim. YOU MAY CHECK ONLY ONE BOX PER COUNT. If you check the box marked "Other," you must identify the specific issue involved in the space provided.
3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you need to state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you need to identify which defendant did what act. You also need to state the date(s) on which the act(s) occurred if possible.
4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights.
5. Administrative Remedies. Exhaustion of administrative remedies is a prerequisite to filing a civil rights complaint. 42 U.S.C. § 1997e requires prisoners to exhaust the available administrative remedies before being allowed to file a civil rights action. Consequently, you must disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If one of your counts is exempt from the grievance procedures or administrative appeals, fully explain the exemption on the lines provided.

Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF:

Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided.

SIGNATURE:

You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Your signature must be an original signature, not a photocopy.

FINAL NOTE

You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint being stricken or dismissed by the court. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If needed, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. The form, however, must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages.

FORM


Summaries of

Banks v. Arpaio

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Jun 13, 2006
No. CV 06-1330-PHX-DGC (VAM) (D. Ariz. Jun. 13, 2006)
Case details for

Banks v. Arpaio

Case Details

Full title:Donald Banks, Plaintiff, v. Joseph Arpaio, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Jun 13, 2006

Citations

No. CV 06-1330-PHX-DGC (VAM) (D. Ariz. Jun. 13, 2006)