From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banks v. Alamance-Burlington Bd. of Educ.

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Jul 22, 2024
1:23CV1112 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 22, 2024)

Opinion

1:23CV1112

07-22-2024

KEISHA BANKS, Plaintiff, v. ALAMANCE-BURLINGTON BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant(s).


ORDER

Loretta C. Biggs, United States District Judge

The Order and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on June 20, 2024, was served on the parties in this action. (ECF Nos. 18, 19). Plaintiff filed Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation on July 5, 2024. (ECF No. 20.)

The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's Objections and has made a de novo determination which is in accord with the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. The Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Alamance-Burlington Board of Education's Amended Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, (ECF No. 10), is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED as it relates to Plaintiffs' state law intentional infliction of emotional distress claim for lack of jurisdiction due to governmental immunity, or alternatively for failure to state such a claim, but otherwise DENIED.


Summaries of

Banks v. Alamance-Burlington Bd. of Educ.

United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina
Jul 22, 2024
1:23CV1112 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Banks v. Alamance-Burlington Bd. of Educ.

Case Details

Full title:KEISHA BANKS, Plaintiff, v. ALAMANCE-BURLINGTON BOARD OF EDUCATION…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of North Carolina

Date published: Jul 22, 2024

Citations

1:23CV1112 (M.D.N.C. Jul. 22, 2024)