From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banking Association v. Insurance Association

U.S.
Jan 1, 1880
102 U.S. 121 (1880)

Opinion

OCTOBER TERM, 1880.

1. An appeal will be dismissed when it appears from the record, taken as a whole, that the amount actually in controversy is not sufficient to give the court jurisdiction. 2. Gray v. Blanchard ( 97 U.S. 564) reaffirmed.

Mr. J.D. Rouse and Mr. William Grant for the appellant.

Mr. Charles B. Singleton, Jr., contra.


APPEAL from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Louisiana.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.


From this record it appears affirmatively that the only dispute between the parties is as to the right of the insurance association to withhold a transfer of stock until an indebtedness of a stockholder to it for $2,074.36 is paid. Such being the case, we have no jurisdiction of this appeal. In Gray v. Blanchard ( 97 U.S. 564) we held that a writ of error must be dismissed when it appears from the record, taken as a whole, that the amount actually in controversy between the parties was not sufficient to give us jurisdiction.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Banking Association v. Insurance Association

U.S.
Jan 1, 1880
102 U.S. 121 (1880)
Case details for

Banking Association v. Insurance Association

Case Details

Full title:BANKING ASSOCIATION v . INSURANCE ASSOCIATION

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jan 1, 1880

Citations

102 U.S. 121 (1880)

Citing Cases

Webster v. Buffalo Insurance Co.

Such is now the established rule. Schacker v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company, 93 U.S. 241; Gray v.…

Home Life Ins. v. Sipp

That amount is either precisely $3,000 or something less. Thus it appears the interposition of the…