From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banker v. Banker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 5, 1998
248 A.D.2d 144 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

March 5, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.),


The Judicial Hearing Officer's findings, in large part based on credible expert testimony, have support in the record, and were properly confirmed by the trial court in the exercise of its wide discretion with respect to equitable distribution ( see, Pologe v. Goler, 194 A.D.2d 445; Freedman v. Freedman, 211 A.D.2d 580). We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Banker v. Banker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 5, 1998
248 A.D.2d 144 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Banker v. Banker

Case Details

Full title:AMY BANKER, Respondent v. BROOKS BANKER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 5, 1998

Citations

248 A.D.2d 144 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
670 N.Y.S.2d 67

Citing Cases

Murtha v. Murtha

In view of the enormous disparity between the parties' current and future income potential and the loss of…

Chapin v. Chapin

Shortly thereafter, the respondent learned that the appellant had purchased hundreds of acres of waterfront…