From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank v. Burlington

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1899
32 S.E. 558 (N.C. 1899)

Opinion

(Decided 21 March, 1899.)

Practice — Court Evenly Divided.

Where the appellate court is evenly divided, the settled practice in such cases is, that the judgment below stands, not as a precedent, but as a decision in the case.

ACTION tried before Timberlake, J., upon report of referee and exceptions thereto, at September Term, 1898, of ALAMANCE. Judgment in favor of plaintiff. Appeal by defendant.

Winston Fuller for plaintiff.

Bynum Taylor, C. E. McLean, and W. H. Carroll for defendant.


In this case Justice Clark did not sit, and the Court is evenly divided. According to the settled practice of appellate courts in such cases, the judgment below stands, not as a precedent, but as the decision in this case. Puryear v. Leach, 121 N.C. 255; (252) Durham v. R. R., 113 N.C. 240, and cases there cited.

AFFIRMED.

Cited: Barnes v. Public Service Co., 163 N.C. 365.


Summaries of

Bank v. Burlington

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 1899
32 S.E. 558 (N.C. 1899)
Case details for

Bank v. Burlington

Case Details

Full title:BANK v. BURLINGTON

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 1899

Citations

32 S.E. 558 (N.C. 1899)
124 N.C. 251