Opinion
9066 Index 32806/16E
04-23-2019
Sandelands Eyet, LLP, New York (Kathleen Cavanaugh of counsel), for appellant. Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for respondent.
Sandelands Eyet, LLP, New York (Kathleen Cavanaugh of counsel), for appellant.
Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for respondent.
Renwick, J.P., Gische, Webber, Singh, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucindo Suarez, J.), entered December 11, 2017, which, in this mortgage foreclosure action, denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and related relief, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Issues of fact exist on the issue of standing because there are unexplained discrepancies in the copy of the note attached to the complaint. Although the word "copy" had been stamped on the note, it was crossed out on the first page, but not the other pages and the word "copy" was typewritten on some of the riders. None of these discrepancies were explained or addressed in the affidavit, making it unclear whether plaintiff possessed the original note when this action was commenced (see Aurora Loan Services, LLC v Taylor, 25 N.Y.3d 355, 361, 12 N.Y.S.3d 612, 34 N.E.3d 363 [2015] ).
We have considered the remaining arguments by appellant and find them unavailing.