From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank of New York v. Carlucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 2001
289 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

2000-08614

Submitted December 3, 2001.

December 17, 2001.

In an action to recover on a promissory note, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), dated July 31, 2000, which denied their motion, inter alia, to vacate an amended judgment entered December 3, 1999, and to impose a sanction on the plaintiff's attorney for frivolous conduct.

Peter G. McKiernan, White Plains, N.Y., for appellants.

Eugene J. Grillo, Middletown, N.Y., for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., NANCY E. SMITH, THOMAS A. ADAMS, A. GAIL PRUDENTI, JJ.


ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order as denied those branches of the defendants' motion which were to vacate the amended judgment and for related relief is dismissed as academic (see, Bank of New York v. Carlucci, A.D.2d [Appellate Division Docket No. 2000-02910, decided herewith]), without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

ORDERED that so much of the order as denied that branch of the motion which was to impose a sanction on the plaintiff's attorney is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The court providently exercised its discretion in declining to impose a sanction on the plaintiff's attorney.

ALTMAN, J.P., SMITH, ADAMS and PRUDENTI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bank of New York v. Carlucci

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 2001
289 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Bank of New York v. Carlucci

Case Details

Full title:BANK OF NEW YORK, respondent, v. ROBERT A. CARLUCCI, et al., appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 17, 2001

Citations

289 A.D.2d 350 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
735 N.Y.S.2d 398