From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST CO. N.A. v. OLDS

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
May 30, 2008
NO. 3-08-CV-0630-K (N.D. Tex. May. 30, 2008)

Opinion

NO. 3-08-CV-0630-K.

May 30, 2008


ORDER


After conducting a review of the pleadings, files and records in this case, and the Findings and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), I am of the opinion that the Findings and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are hereby accepted as the Findings of the Court.

Defendant Olds filed a "Complaint" on May 15, 2008, and because she is the defendant in this attempted Notice of Removal, the Court strikes the Complaint from the records in this case. In the event that she wishes the Court to consider this a separate civil action, she must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules and file a separate cause of action. Further, that action must allege proper federal jurisdiction, or it will be subject to summary dismissal.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST CO. N.A. v. OLDS

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division
May 30, 2008
NO. 3-08-CV-0630-K (N.D. Tex. May. 30, 2008)
Case details for

BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST CO. N.A. v. OLDS

Case Details

Full title:BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST CO. N.A. Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN K. OLDS Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division

Date published: May 30, 2008

Citations

NO. 3-08-CV-0630-K (N.D. Tex. May. 30, 2008)

Citing Cases

Felder v. Countrywide Home Loans

" However, in each of the cases that Felder cites to support his argument the plaintiff had brought a…

Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'n v. Talley

He has therefore failed to show that federal question jurisdiction exists over this case. See Bank of N.Y.…