From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank of Las Vegas v. Cole

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-00940-MMD-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 23, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:12-cv-00940-MMD-VCF

01-23-2013

BANK OF LAS VEGAS, A NEVADA CORPORATION, AS SUCCESSOR BY STATUTORY MERGER TO DESERT COMMUNITY BANK, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN R. COLE, SUZANNE WHITTAKER, DAN R. RICHARDS AND SOUTHWEST APPRAISAL ASSOCIATES INC., Defendants.


ORDER


(Def.'s Emergency Mtn. to Stay - dkt. no. 31)

Before the Court is Defendant's Emergency Motion to Stay. (Dkt. no. 31.) Local Rule 7-5(d) establishes requirements for seeking court intervention to resolve an emergency dispute. In particular, counsel must demonstrate that the parties are unable to resolve their dispute "after personal consultation and sincere effort to do so" before seeking emergency relief. Id. Here, neither the Motion nor the supporting affidavit of counsel contains the certification required under Local Rule 7-5(d)(3). Accordingly, Defendant's Motion is DENIED.

________________

MIRANDA M. DU

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Bank of Las Vegas v. Cole

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 23, 2013
Case No. 2:12-cv-00940-MMD-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 23, 2013)
Case details for

Bank of Las Vegas v. Cole

Case Details

Full title:BANK OF LAS VEGAS, A NEVADA CORPORATION, AS SUCCESSOR BY STATUTORY MERGER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 23, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:12-cv-00940-MMD-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 23, 2013)