ROSSMAN, J. The note, mortgage and parties now before us are the same as those in Bank of Commerce of Oregon City v. Ryan, 152 Or. 614 ( 52 P.2d 1139). This is a continuation of that controversy.
When Briggs asserted that the appellant claimed an interest in the land but that it was inferior to his liens, the appellant was required to plead and prove whatever interest he had which he might claim to be superior to that of the appellee. Having failed to do so, he is in no position now to claim a superior lien. Bank of Commerce v. Ryan, 152 Or. 614, 52 P.2d 1139 (1936); Rule 55(c), Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure. There is nothing in the record showing excusable neglect, unavoidable casualty or any other just cause for setting the decree aside.