From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank of China v. NBM L. L. C.

U.S.
Jun 27, 2005
545 U.S. 1138 (2005)

Opinion

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.

No. 03-1559.

JUNE 27, 2005.


Reported below: 359 F. 3d 171 and 89 Fed. Appx. 751.

Certiorari Granted. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: "Did the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit err when it held that civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act plaintiffs alleging mail and wire fraud as predicate acts must establish `reasonable reliance' under 18 U. S. C. § 1964(c)?"


Summaries of

Bank of China v. NBM L. L. C.

U.S.
Jun 27, 2005
545 U.S. 1138 (2005)
Case details for

Bank of China v. NBM L. L. C.

Case Details

Full title:BANK OF CHINA, NEW YORK BRANCH v. NBM L. L. C. ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 27, 2005

Citations

545 U.S. 1138 (2005)
125 S. Ct. 2956

Citing Cases

In re Pharm. Indus. Average Wholesale Price Litig.

SeeSystems Mgt., Inc. v. Loiselle, 303 F.3d 100, 104 (1st Cir.2002) (" [C]riminal fraud under the federal…

Brown v. Cassens Transport

We think it noteworthy that both the Fourth and Fifth Circuits have since expressly reaffirmed the necessity…