From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank of California v. Dunn

Supreme Court of California
Oct 23, 1884
66 Cal. 38 (Cal. 1884)

Opinion

         Department Two

         Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Sacramento.

         COUNSEL:

         W. W. Foote, and McKune & George, for Appellant.

          S. C. Denson, and S. W. Sanderson, for Respondent.


         OPINION

         THE COURT          The Court below rendered judgment, that the defendant draw his warrant for the amount of an interest coupon on a bond issued under the Act of April 4, 1864. (Stat. 1863-4, p. 344.) We are of opinion that none of the matters presented on behalf of defendant are sufficient to justify the withholding of the warrant. The act above referred to pledged the faith of the State to the payment to the holder of the bonds mentioned therein of such interest as is involved in this action.

         Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Bank of California v. Dunn

Supreme Court of California
Oct 23, 1884
66 Cal. 38 (Cal. 1884)
Case details for

Bank of California v. Dunn

Case Details

Full title:BANK OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, v. JOHN P. DUNN, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Oct 23, 1884

Citations

66 Cal. 38 (Cal. 1884)
4 P. 916

Citing Cases

Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.

In such a case, as the plaintiff cannot determine in advance of the suit the amount by him to be repaid, an…

Haserot v. Keller

In such case the plaintiff cannot determine, in advance of the suit, the amount by him to be repaid, and is…