From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank of America, N.A. v. 37C Team, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sep 30, 2022
353 So. 3d 1200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D20-1464.

09-30-2022

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Petitioner, v. 37C TEAM, LLC, Respondent.

Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo, and Adam J. Wick , for petitioner. Jacobs Legal, PLLC, and Bruce Jacobs , for respondent. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and LOBREE, JJ.


Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo, and Adam J. Wick , for petitioner.

Jacobs Legal, PLLC, and Bruce Jacobs , for respondent.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE and LOBREE, JJ.

LOBREE, J.

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of certiorari and response thereto, we find that with respect to the discovery materials that are the subject of this petition, the trial court's order denying in part Bank of America's motion for protective order departs from the essential requirements of the law, thereby causing irreparable injury. See Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Figueroa, 299 So.3d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 2019); Rousso v. Hannon, 146 So.3d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014); see also Bank of Am., N.A. v. BCML Holding, LLC, 319 So.3d 786 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021). Therefore, we grant the petition for writ of certiorari and quash the order.

Petition granted; order quashed.


Summaries of

Bank of America, N.A. v. 37C Team, LLC

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Sep 30, 2022
353 So. 3d 1200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Bank of America, N.A. v. 37C Team, LLC

Case Details

Full title:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Petitioner, v. 37C TEAM, LLC, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Sep 30, 2022

Citations

353 So. 3d 1200 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)