From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank of Am. v. N. Am. Title Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 9, 2022
2:21-cv-00415-KJD-VCF (D. Nev. Dec. 9, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00415-KJD-VCF

12-09-2022

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, Plaintiff, v. NORTH AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, DOE INDIVIDUALS I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS XI through XX, inclusive, Defendants.

SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP Kevin S Sinclair, Esq Attorneys for Defendant, North American Title Insurance Company WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Linds ay D. Dragon, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A. as Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP


SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP Kevin S Sinclair, Esq Attorneys for Defendant, North American Title Insurance Company

WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Linds ay D. Dragon, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A. as Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE A PROPOSED DISCOVERY PLAN (FIRST REQUEST)

Cam Ferenbach United States Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A. as Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP (“BANA”) and Defendant, North American Title Insurance Company (“NATIC”), by and through their undersigned counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On March 9, 2021, BANA filed its Complaint in Eighth Judicial District Court, Case No. A-21-830782-C [ECF No. 1-1];

2. On March 11, 2021, NATIC filed a Petition for Removal to this Court [ECF No. 1];

3. On November 8, 2022, the Parties filed a Joint Status Report advising the Court that the Parties attended a private mediation on September 29, 2022, which did not result in settlement. The Parties requested thirty (30) days to submit their proposed discovery plan [ECF No. 14];

4. B ANA's counsel has been unavailable due to a recent Ninth Circuit oral argument and in light of the upcoming holidays, the Parties are requesting an additional thirty-two (32) days, through and including January 9, 2023, to file their proposed discovery plan;

5. Counsel for NATIC does not oppose the requested extension;

6. This is the first request for an extension which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bank of Am. v. N. Am. Title Ins. Co.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Dec 9, 2022
2:21-cv-00415-KJD-VCF (D. Nev. Dec. 9, 2022)
Case details for

Bank of Am. v. N. Am. Title Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Dec 9, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-00415-KJD-VCF (D. Nev. Dec. 9, 2022)