Opinion
2:21-cv-00415-KJD-VCF
08-21-2023
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff, v. NORTH AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; DOE INDIVIDUALS I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS XI through XX, inclusive, Defendants.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13474 Attorneys for Plaintiff SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12277 Attorneys for Defendant.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13474 Attorneys for Plaintiff
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12277 Attorneys for Defendant.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TOME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF COUNTERMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 32]
(SECOND REQUEST)
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A.'s (“BANA”) Countermotion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 32] filed on March 31,2023. Defendant, North American Title Insurance Company (“NATIC”) filed its Opposition on July 28, 2023 [ECF No. 44], BANA's reply is currently due on August 18, 2023 [ECF No. 46]. BANA requests a brief, two-week extension until September 1, 2023 for its reply deadline as additional time is needed for BANA's counsel to review and respond to the points and authorities cited in NATIC's Opposition. NATIC does not oppose the request for an extension.
Accordingly, the Parties stipulate and agree to a two-week extension of time for BANA's reply, through and including September 1, 2023. This is BANA's second request for an extension of time to file its reply brief, which is not intended to cause delay or any undue prejudice to the Parties.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.