Opinion
2:21-cv-00415-KJD-VCF
08-10-2023
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff, v. NORTH AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; DOE INDIVIDUALS I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS XI through XX, inclusive, Defendants.
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Darren T. Brenner, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8386 Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13474 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A. SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12277 Attorneys for Defendants
WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP Darren T. Brenner, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 8386 Lindsay D. Dragon, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 13474 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A.
SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP Kevin S. Sinclair, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 12277 Attorneys for Defendants
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF COUNTERMOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF No. 32] (First Request)
Pending before the Court is Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A.'s (“BANA”) Countermotion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 32] filed on March 31, 2023. Defendant, North American Title Insurance Company (“NATIC”) filed its Opposition on July 28, 2023 [ECF No. 44], BANA's reply is currently due on August 11,2023. BANA requests a brief, one-week extension to August 18, 2023, for its reply deadline in order to review and respond to the points and authorities cited to in NATIC's Opposition. NATIC does not oppose the request for an extension. Accordingly, the Parties stipulate and agree to a one-week extension of time for BANA's Reply through and including August 18, 2023.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.