From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank of Am. v. Fid. Nat'l Title Grp.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 12, 2022
2:21-cv-00348-GNM-BNW (D. Nev. Apr. 12, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-00348-GNM-BNW

04-12-2022

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP, Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC.; COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; CHICAGO TITLE OF NEVADA, INC.; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE AGENCY OF NEVADA, INC., DOE INDIVIDUALS I through X; and ROE CORPORATIONS XI through XX, inclusive, Defendants.


STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS [ECF Nos. 34, 37, 39]

[SECOND REQUEST]

GLORIA M. NAVARRO, DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”), and Defendants Fidelity National Title Group, Inc., Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, Fidelity National Title Insurance Company, Chicago Title of Nevada, Inc., and Fidelity National Title Agency of Nevada, Inc. (collectively “Defendants” and with BANA, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. On February 11, 2022, BANA filed its First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 33].
2. On February 24, 2022, multiple motions to dismiss BANA's First Amended Complaint were filed by Defendants, including the Motion to Dismiss filed by Fidelity National Title
Insurance Company, Inc. and Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company [ECF No. 34], the Motion to Dismiss filed by Chicago Title of Nevada, Inc. and Fidelity National Title Agency of Nevada, Inc. [ECF No. 37], and the Motion to Dismiss filed by Fidelity National Title Group, Inc. [ECF No. 39] (collectively the “Motions to Dismiss”).
3. BANA's deadline to respond to the Motions to Dismiss is April 11, 2022 [ECF No. 40].
4. BANA requests a fourteen (14) day extension of time to file its responses to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, until April 25, 2022. The extension is requested to afford BANA's counsel additional time to review and respond to the arguments in Defendants' Motions to Dismiss.
5. Counsel for Defendants does not oppose the requested extension.
6. This is the second request for an extension which is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bank of Am. v. Fid. Nat'l Title Grp.

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Apr 12, 2022
2:21-cv-00348-GNM-BNW (D. Nev. Apr. 12, 2022)
Case details for

Bank of Am. v. Fid. Nat'l Title Grp.

Case Details

Full title:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING…

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Apr 12, 2022

Citations

2:21-cv-00348-GNM-BNW (D. Nev. Apr. 12, 2022)