Opinion
3:20-CV-00046-MMD-CSD
12-19-2022
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff, v. CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY et al., Defendants.
Scott E. Gizer, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 12216, Sophia S. Lau, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13365, EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP, Kevin S. Sinclair, NV Bar No. 12277 SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP, Attorneys for Defendants CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC.; and TICOR TITLE OF NEVADA, INC. DESIGNATED LOCAL COUNSEL FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS ON SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP PER L.R. IA 11-1(b) Janet Trost, Esq. WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Scott E. Gizer, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 12216, Sophia S. Lau, Esq., Nevada Bar No. 13365, EARLY SULLIVAN WRIGHT GIZER & McRAE LLP, Kevin S. Sinclair, NV Bar No. 12277 SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP, Attorneys for Defendants CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY; FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE GROUP, INC.; and TICOR TITLE OF NEVADA, INC.
DESIGNATED LOCAL COUNSEL FOR SERVICE OF PROCESS ON SINCLAIR BRAUN LLP PER L.R. IA 11-1(b) Janet Trost, Esq.
WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP LINDSAY D. DRAGON Attorneys for Plaintiff BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 72)
FIRST REQUEST
CRAIG S. DENNEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
COMES NOW defendants Chicago Title Insurance Company (“Chicago Title”), Fidelity National Title Group, Inc., (“FNTG”) and Ticor Title of Nevada, Inc. (“Ticor Agency”) (collectively, “Defendants”) and plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, which hereby agree and stipulate as follows:
1. On October 11, 2022, the Court granted the Parties' stipulation allowing BANA to file a second amended complaint in this action, and setting Defendants' respective response deadlines for 30 days after the filing of that amended complaint (ECF No. 68);
2. On November 17, 2022, BANA filed its second amended complaint (the “SAC”) (ECF No. 72);
3. Pursuant to the October 11, 2022 stipulation, Defendants' responses to the SAC is currently due on December 19, 2022;
4. Defendants request a forty-five (45) day extension of their respective deadlines to respond to the SAC, through and including Thursday, February 2, 2023, so as to fully respond to the allegations of the SAC and to account for scheduling conflicts as a result of the holiday season;
5. The parties therefore agree and stipulate that Defendants' respective deadlines to respond to the SAC shall be continued through and including February 2, 2023.
6. Counsel for BANA does not oppose the requested extension;
7. This is the first request for an extension made by counsel for Defendants, which is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
8. This stipulation is entered into without waiving any of Defendants' objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12.
IT IS SO STIPULATED that Defendants' respective deadlines to respond to the complaint are hereby continued through and including February 2, 2023.
IT IS SO ORDERED.