Opinion
Motion Nos. 2023-06323 2023-06328 2023-06331 Index No. 135283/2013
12-01-2023
Bank of America, N.A., respondent, v. Raj Chadha, etc., appellant, et al., defendants. Bank of America, N.A., respondent, v. Raj Chadha, etc., appellant, et al., defendants. Bank of America, N.A., respondent, v. Raj Chadha, etc., appellant, et al., defendants.
Unpublished Opinion
MOTION DECISION
M292665
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, J.P., ROBERT J. MILLER, LILLIAN WAN, CARL J. LANDICINO, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Appeals from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County, dated June 15, 2022, and two orders of the same court, both dated March 17, 2023, respectively. Motion by Lester Korinman Kamran & Masini, P.C., for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant, to extend the time to perfect the appeals, and to consolidate the appeals.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is
ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to be relieved as counsel is granted and on or before December 22, 2023, Lester Korinman Kamran & Masini, P.C., shall serve its client by one of the methods specified in CPLR 2103(c), with a copy of this decision and order on motion and shall file proof of such service with the Acting Clerk of this Court, via NYSCEF, if applicable, or, if NYSCEF is not mandated, via email at AD2-Motions@nycourts.gov; and it is further, ORDERED that no further proceedings shall be taken against the appellant, without leave of the Court, until the expiration of 30 days after service upon him of a copy of this decision and order on motion; and it is further, ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to extend the time to perfect the appeals is granted, and on or before March 25, 2024, the appellant shall serve and file the record or appendix and the appellant's brief via NYSCEF, if applicable, or, if NYSCEF is not mandated, serve the record or appendix and the appellant's brief and upload digital copies of the record or appendix and the appellant's brief, with proof of service thereof, through the digital portal on this Court's website; and it is further, ORDERED that the branch of the motion which is to consolidate the appeals is denied as unnecessary as the appeals may be consolidated as of right (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9[f][3]).
IANNACCI, J.P., MILLER, WAN and LANDICINO, JJ., concur.