From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bank of Am. v. Cartwright

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Sep 21, 2022
3:21-CV-184 DRL-MGG (N.D. Ind. Sep. 21, 2022)

Opinion

3:21-CV-184 DRL-MGG 3:21-CV-191 3:21-CV-236

09-21-2022

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff, v. LEVERING RUSSELL CARTWRIGHT et al. Defendants.


ORDER

Daimon R. Leichty Judge

This matter is before the court following Magistrate Judge Michael Gotsch's report and recommendation [ECF 133], which recommended that Bank of America, N.A.'s request to strike [ECF 101] be granted in part, that Levering Russell Cartwright's motion to enforce settlement agreement [ECF 116] be denied, and that Bank of America's motions to seal [ECF 117, 123] be granted in part. No objections were filed by the September 20, 2022 deadline. Satisfied with the well-reasoned report and recommendation and because no party has objected, the court ADOPTS the report in its entirety and DENIES Mr. Cartwright's motion to enforce settlement agreement [ECF 116], including requests from both sides for an award of expenses and fees related to the motion, GRANTS IN PART Bank of America's request to strike [ECF 101] and motions to seal [ECF 117, 123], and ORDERS redactions as detailed in the report and recommendation.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Bank of Am. v. Cartwright

United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana
Sep 21, 2022
3:21-CV-184 DRL-MGG (N.D. Ind. Sep. 21, 2022)
Case details for

Bank of Am. v. Cartwright

Case Details

Full title:BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff, v. LEVERING RUSSELL CARTWRIGHT et al…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Indiana

Date published: Sep 21, 2022

Citations

3:21-CV-184 DRL-MGG (N.D. Ind. Sep. 21, 2022)