From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banhi v. Papa John's USA, Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 29, 2014
583 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-1107

09-29-2014

ROGER M. BANHI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAPA JOHN'S USA, INC.; VICTOR PAZ, in his official and individual capacity; ULISES VISCENCIO, in his official and individual capacity; COLONEL'S LIMITED, LLC, Defendants - Appellees.

Roger M. Banhi, Appellant Pro Se. Ariana Wright Arnold, Jennifer Lynn Curry, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:12-cv-00665-RWT) Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Roger M. Banhi, Appellant Pro Se. Ariana Wright Arnold, Jennifer Lynn Curry, JACKSON LEWIS PC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Roger M. Banhi appeals the district court's orders granting summary judgment to the Defendants on his civil complaint and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Banhi's motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Banhi v. Papa John's USA, Inc., No. 8:12-cv-00665-RWT (D. Md. Jan. 6, 2014; July 18, 2013). We grant Banhi leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Banhi v. Papa John's USA, Inc.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Sep 29, 2014
583 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Banhi v. Papa John's USA, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ROGER M. BANHI, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAPA JOHN'S USA, INC.; VICTOR…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Sep 29, 2014

Citations

583 F. App'x 268 (4th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Tidwell v. Impaq Int'l, LLC

Thus, because these actions exceed the scope of plaintiff's Charge of Discrimination, he has failed to…

Godbolt v. Trinity Prot. Servs., Inc.

Moreover, even if Godbolt's Amended Complaint was somehow construed to state a disparate impact claim, such a…