From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banfield v. U.S. Sugar Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 26, 1987
506 So. 2d 461 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 87-0144.

April 22, 1987. Rehearing Denied May 26, 1987.

Suzanne L. Harris of Florida Rural Legal Services, Inc., Bartow, for appellant.

John D. Maher, Tallahassee, for appellee-Unemployment Appeals Com'n.


ON MOTION TO CERTIFY QUESTION


Consistent with recent rulings by the First District Court of Appeal we grant the appellant's request to certify the following question as an issue of great public importance:

WHETHER A CLAIMANT IN AN UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CASE MAY BE CHARGED A FEE BY THE UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION FOR THE PROVISION OF A TRANSCRIPT OF THE AGENCY HEARING.
See Harris v. Department of Corrections, 486 So.2d 27 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

ANSTEAD, WALDEN and STONE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Banfield v. U.S. Sugar Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 26, 1987
506 So. 2d 461 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Banfield v. U.S. Sugar Corp.

Case Details

Full title:JOEL S. BANFIELD, APPELLANT, v. UNITED STATES SUGAR CORP., AND FLORIDA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 26, 1987

Citations

506 So. 2d 461 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Unemployment Appeals Com'n v. Gretz

We note that the Hearing Officer was without the benefit of the holdings in Roberts and Martinez at the time…

Roberts v. Unemployment Appeals Comm

We believe that there is no statute or rule provision which obliges the Commission to prepare the transcripts…