From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Baney v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 10, 2013
2013-3088 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 10, 2013)

Opinion

2013-3088

06-10-2013

JOHN-PIERRE BANEY, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DA4324120108-I-1.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The Department of Justice moves without opposition (1) to reform the caption to designate the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board") as the respondent and (2) for an extension of time for the respondent to file its brief.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed John-Pierre Baney's petition for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to reform the caption is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.

(2) The motion for an extension of time is granted. The respondent's brief is due within 21 days of the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

______________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
s25


Summaries of

Baney v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 10, 2013
2013-3088 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Baney v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:JOHN-PIERRE BANEY, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 10, 2013

Citations

2013-3088 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 10, 2013)