From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banegas v. Langford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 8, 2017
Case No. CV 16-2195-DMG (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. CV 16-2195-DMG (SP)

06-08-2017

JOSE ENRIQUE BANEGAS, Petitioner, v. STEVE LANGFORD, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that respondent's Motion to Dismiss is granted, and Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. DATED: June 8, 2017

/s/_________

DOLLY M. GEE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Banegas v. Langford

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 8, 2017
Case No. CV 16-2195-DMG (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2017)
Case details for

Banegas v. Langford

Case Details

Full title:JOSE ENRIQUE BANEGAS, Petitioner, v. STEVE LANGFORD, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 8, 2017

Citations

Case No. CV 16-2195-DMG (SP) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 8, 2017)