From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bane v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Feb 25, 2013
No. 3:12-CV-174 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 25, 2013)

Opinion

No. 3:12-CV-174

02-25-2013

DONALD R. BANE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


(Phillips/Guyton)


JUDGMENT ORDER

For the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion filed contemporaneously with this order, the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge [Doc. 20] is ACCEPTED IN WHOLE under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

IT IS ORDERED, for the reasons stated in the report and recommendation, which the court adopts and incorporates into its ruling, that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [Doc. 15] is DENIED; the defendant Commissioner's motion for summary judgment [Doc. 17] is GRANTED; the defendant Commissioner's decision in this case denying plaintiff's application for benefits under the Social Security Act is AFFIRMED; and this case is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

ENTER:

Thomas W. Phillips

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Bane v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE
Feb 25, 2013
No. 3:12-CV-174 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Bane v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DONALD R. BANE, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE

Date published: Feb 25, 2013

Citations

No. 3:12-CV-174 (E.D. Tenn. Feb. 25, 2013)