Opinion
2:19-CV-00095-RFB-DJA
10-03-2023
RICHARD BANDA, Plaintiff, v. NAPHCARE, INC. a corporation; LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, a political entity; KRYSTAL CAREY, an individual; ERIC LOPEZ, an individual; HORACE TADEO, an individual; ANN BOHL, an individual; HARRY DURAN, an individual; ANTHONY HAYES, an individual; SCOTT COLE, an individual; DEBRA VANDERWAAG, an individual; SAVANNAH KEAWE, an individual; and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-5, Defendants.
McDonald Carano LLP Jane Susskind Adam Hosmer-Henner, Esq. Jane Susskind, Esq. Kiley Harrison, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Richard Banda MARQUIS AURBACH Jackie V. Nichols Craig R. Anderson, Esq Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
McDonald Carano LLP Jane Susskind Adam Hosmer-Henner, Esq. Jane Susskind, Esq. Kiley Harrison, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff Richard Banda
MARQUIS AURBACH Jackie V. Nichols Craig R. Anderson, Esq Esq. Attorneys for Defendant Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT'S RESPONSIVE PLEADING/ANSWER (FIRST REQUEST)
Plaintiff Richard Banda (“Plaintiff”), by and through their attorneys of record, Adam Hosmer-Henner, Esq., Jane Susskind, Esq., and Kiley Harrison, Esq., with the law firm of McDonald Carano LLP and Defendant, the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department (the “Department” or “LVMPD”), by and through their attorneys of record, Craig R. Anderson, Esq. and Jackie V. Nichols, Esq., with the law firm of Marquis Aurbach, and hereby agree and jointly stipulate the following;
1. Plaintiff filed their Second Amended Complaint on September 1, 2023 [ECF No. 68];
2. Plaintiff served their Second Amended Complaint on LVMPD on September 11, 2023 [ECF No. 71];
3. Counsel for LVMPD had a death in the family and has not had sufficient time to review the Second Amended Complaint and prepare a response, and therefore, is unable to meet the deadline of October 2, 2023 currently scheduled for LVMPD's response to the Second Amended Complaint;
4. The Parties have agreed to a four-day extension for LVMPD's Responsive Pleading/Answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint;
5. Accordingly, the deadline for LVMPD's Responsive Pleading/Answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint, currently due on October 2, 2023, be extended to and including Friday, October 6, 2023;
6. This is the Parties' first request to extend the deadline to LVMPD's Responsive Pleading/Answer to Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint; and
7. This Stipulation is being entered in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
The above Stipulation is hereby GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED: