From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banco Popular De P.R. v. Classy Lady

UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
Mar 28, 2014
CIV. No.: 10-1976(GAG/SCC) (D.P.R. Mar. 28, 2014)

Opinion

CIV. No.: 10-1976(GAG/SCC)

03-28-2014

BANCO POPULAR DE P.R., Plaintiff, v. M/V CLASSY LADY, ET AL., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

On March 26, 2012, the Court entered a final judgment against, among others, Defendant Ismael González-Lebrón. Docket No. 46. During the proceedings to enforce the judgment, González died. See Docket No. 60-1 (death certificate). Accordingly, the Court granted Banco Popular's motion to substitute González's heirs—his widow, Luz Eneida Morales-Cosme, and his daughter, Marta C. González—for González as defendants in this action. Docket No. 63. Banco Popular understands that, under González's open will, Luz Eneida and Marta are his sole heirs. See Docket No. 66, at 2. It further understands that neither has accepted or rejected González's heritage. See id. at 3.

Given this procedural history, Banco Popular wishes to invoke a procedure known as interpellatio in iure, by which we should direct González's heirs to accept or reject their inheritance within a specified period of time. See BBVA v. Latinoamericana de Exportacion, Inc., 164 D.P.R. 689 (2005) (explaining interpellatio in iure). Under Puerto Rico law, an inheritance is not effective until an heir actually accepts it. See id. at 695 (citing Rivera Rivera v. Monge Rivera, 117 D.P.R. 464 (1986)). Nonetheless, the law recognizes that certain parties, including judgment creditors to the decedent, have an interest in settling the matter of inheritance such that they may know whether they may pursue their claims against the putative heirs. See id. at 695-96. Interpellatio is the procedure by which a creditor, for example, forces such a settlement. See id. at 696. By statute, such an action may not be instituted until at least nine days after the decedent's death, see P.R. LAWS ANN. tit. 31, § 2786, a period that has obviously elapsed. Once the procedure is properly invoked, however, the court must fix a period for "the heir to accept or repudiate the inheritance"; this period may not exceed thirty days, and if the heir fails to respond the inheritance is deemed accepted. P.R. LAWS ANN. tit. 31, § 2787; see also BBVA, 164 D.P.R. at 696.

We conclude that the interpellatio procedure has been properly invoked, and, in accordance with the rule laid down in BBVA, 164 D.P.R. at 696-97, we make the following Order:

(1) Within thirty days of being served with a copy of this Order, Luz Eneida Morales Cosme and Marta C. González shall each accept or repudiate the above-mentioned inheritance.
(2) Luz Eneida Morales Cosme and Marta C. González are hereby put on notice that a failure to comply with the above deadline will result in our deeming the inheritance accepted.
(3) the acceptance or rejection mentioned above must be made through a public instrument or a judicial writing.

Banco Popular is responsible for serving this Order on Luz Eneida Morales Cosme and Marta C. González. The deadline set forth above shall not begin to run until after service has been properly made.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 28th day of March, 2014.

SILVIA CARREÑO-COLL

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Banco Popular De P.R. v. Classy Lady

UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
Mar 28, 2014
CIV. No.: 10-1976(GAG/SCC) (D.P.R. Mar. 28, 2014)
Case details for

Banco Popular De P.R. v. Classy Lady

Case Details

Full title:BANCO POPULAR DE P.R., Plaintiff, v. M/V CLASSY LADY, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Date published: Mar 28, 2014

Citations

CIV. No.: 10-1976(GAG/SCC) (D.P.R. Mar. 28, 2014)