From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banana Kelly Union HDFC v. Chambers

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
May 25, 2016
41 N.Y.S.3d 448 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)

Opinion

No. 571176/15.

05-25-2016

BANANA KELLY UNION HDFC, Petitioner–Landlord–Respondent, v. Christina CHAMBERS, Respondent–Tenant–Appellant.


Order (Laurie Marin, J.), dated August 28, 2015, reversed, without costs, motion denied and stipulation reinstated.

Stipulations are favored by the courts and will be set aside only upon a showing of good cause sufficient to invalidate a contract, such as fraud, collusion, mistake, or accident (see Hallock v. State of New York, 64 N.Y.2d 224, 230 [1984] ). Here, landlord failed to make a sufficient evidentiary showing that the stipulation discontinuing the underlying nonpayment proceeding was based on mistake (see Matthews v. Castro, 35 AD3d 403 [2006] ; El v. Schertz, 33 AD3d 585 [2006] ). Nor did landlord adequately explain the eleven-month delay in seeking vacatur relief (see Charlop v. A .O. Smith Water Prods., 64 AD3d 486 [2009] ; Matter of Bouloy v. Peters, 262 A.D.2d 209 [1999] ).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.

I concur.


Summaries of

Banana Kelly Union HDFC v. Chambers

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.
May 25, 2016
41 N.Y.S.3d 448 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)
Case details for

Banana Kelly Union HDFC v. Chambers

Case Details

Full title:BANANA KELLY UNION HDFC, Petitioner–Landlord–Respondent, v. Christina…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 25, 2016

Citations

41 N.Y.S.3d 448 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)