From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Banana Kelly Union HDFC v. Chambers

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
May 25, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 50812 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)

Opinion

571176/15

05-25-2016

Banana Kelly Union HDFC, Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent, v. Christina Chambers, Respondent-Tenant-Appellant.


PRESENT: Schoenfeld, J.P., Hunter, Jr., Ling-Cohan, JJ.

Tenant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Laurie Marin, J.), dated August 28, 2015, which granted landlord's motion to vacate a stipulation discontinuing a nonpayment summary proceeding.

Per Curiam.

Order (Laurie Marin, J.), dated August 28, 2015, reversed, without costs, motion denied and stipulation reinstated.

Stipulations are favored by the courts and will be set aside only upon a showing of good cause sufficient to invalidate a contract, such as fraud, collusion, mistake, or accident (see Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224, 230 [1984]). Here, landlord failed to make a sufficient evidentiary showing that the stipulation discontinuing the underlying nonpayment proceeding was based on mistake (see Matthews v Castro, 35 AD3d 403 [2006]; El v Schertz, 33 AD3d 585 [2006]). Nor did landlord adequately explain the eleven-month delay in seeking vacatur relief (see Charlop v A.O. Smith Water Prods., 64 AD3d 486 [2009]; Matter of Bouloy v Peters, 262 AD2d 209 [1999]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT. I concur I concur I concur

Decision Date: May 25, 2016


Summaries of

Banana Kelly Union HDFC v. Chambers

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
May 25, 2016
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 50812 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)
Case details for

Banana Kelly Union HDFC v. Chambers

Case Details

Full title:Banana Kelly Union HDFC, Petitioner-Landlord-Respondent, v. Christina…

Court:SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT

Date published: May 25, 2016

Citations

2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 50812 (N.Y. App. Term 2016)
41 N.Y.S.3d 448