From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bambino v. Bambino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1999
261 A.D.2d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

May 10, 1999

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Trainor, R.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The appellant did not demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his default and a meritorious defense. Accordingly, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying his motion to vacate his default ( see, Sayagh v. Sayagh, 205 A.D.2d 678; Arvanetes v. Arvanetes, 191 A.D.2d 893).

The appellant's remaining contention is without merit.

S. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Friedmann and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Bambino v. Bambino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 10, 1999
261 A.D.2d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Bambino v. Bambino

Case Details

Full title:ANNETTE BAMBINO, Respondent, v. THOMAS BAMBINO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 10, 1999

Citations

261 A.D.2d 426 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
687 N.Y.S.2d 294

Citing Cases

Sommers v. Sommers

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs. Although this court has adopted a liberal policy with respect…

Puchal v. Puchal

The appellant did not demonstrate a reasonable excuse for his default and a meritorious defense. Accordingly,…