From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Balt v. J.S. Funding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 5, 1996
230 A.D.2d 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

August 5, 1996


In an action to determine certain rights to real property pursuant to RPAPL article 15, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Yoswein, J.), dated March 9, 1995, which, inter alia, granted the defendants' motion to dismiss their complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A tenant is not an indispensable party to a foreclosure action, and the failure to name a tenant does not render the judgment of foreclosure and sale defective (see, 1 Bergman, New York Mortgage Foreclosures § 12.03 [1]; see also, Genuth v First Div. Ave. Realty Corp., 88 Misc.2d 586). Accordingly, there is no merit to the plaintiffs' challenge to the amended judgment of foreclosure and sale entered in a related action.

The plaintiffs' remaining contentions are without merit. Thompson, J.P., Joy, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Balt v. J.S. Funding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 5, 1996
230 A.D.2d 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

Balt v. J.S. Funding Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ROGER BALT et al., Appellants, v. J.S. FUNDING CORP. et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 5, 1996

Citations

230 A.D.2d 699 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 50

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Mazzara

Indeed, the affidavit submitted by Frank Mazzara did not even affirmatively assert that he was residing at…

ROSSROCK 2005 FUND LLC v. ESTATE OF SHUI KING WONG

Further, it is true, as plaintiff asserts, that "the absence of a necessary party in a foreclosure action…